Writesonic is built for teams that generate content at volume, with AI visibility tracking bundled in and its deepest features on Enterprise. Omnia is built for teams that make AI visibility the job, with four engines tracked daily in any market and an agent that acts on the gaps, from €79/month.
Facts checked October 2026 · How we compare tools
No credit card required.
Starting price
AI engines tracked daily
Free trial
Euro amounts for prices published in US dollars are approximate, converted at the European Central Bank rate of 15 October 2026.
Both track AI visibility. The difference is how often, how deep, and what you get when the data comes back.
See how your brand shows up in AI answers, free for 14 days.
These tools overlap less than they seem. Writesonic generates content and tracks AI visibility alongside it. Omnia is built around whether that content is working in AI search and what to do when it isn't, with an agent to act on it. The question is whether you need one, the other, or both.
You're already publishing content regularly and need to know whether it's being cited in AI answers - not just whether it ranks in Google.You need Perplexity and Google AI Mode tracked alongside ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews on every plan, without an Enterprise contract.You need sentiment analysis that goes to the feature level - showing which specific product attributes AI praises and criticizes against competitors - without moving to a $399/mo (about €356) plan.You want an agent that creates, updates and publishes content and runs outreach, always with your approval, rather than limited trial runs.You operate across multiple countries and need localized citation data from real browser sessions in each market, not one market per plan.Citation gaps, where competitors get recommended instead of you, are costing you consideration in buying decisions, not just traffic from Google.Teams at Iberia Cards, The Power MBA, and INDYA use Omnia to track AI visibility across markets — not just monitor it
Read their stories
Content generation at volume is your primary need and AI visibility is a secondary consideration you want bundled in one subscription.You need AI-assisted writing, brand voice consistency, and SEO content workflows managed in a single platform.You're not yet publishing enough content to make citation tracking and a prioritized action backlog useful - volume comes before visibility optimization.You want more prompts per plan in a single market (50 on Starter) and don't need Perplexity or Google AI Mode tracked.Writesonic's Starter plan costs $79/mo (about €70) billed yearly ($99/mo, about €88, billed monthly) and tracks 50 prompts daily in ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, in one market, without sentiment analysis, which starts on Growth at $399/mo (about €356) billed yearly. Perplexity, Google AI Mode and the full Action Center come with Enterprise. Omnia starts at €79/mo (€63/mo billed annually), after a 14-day free trial, with ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode tracked daily for 25 prompts in any country and language, feature-level sentiment analysis, prompt suggestions and the Omnia Agent. Writesonic gives you more prompts for the price; Omnia gives you more engines, every market and the tools to act on what you find.
€79/mo
Growth plan · €63/mo billed annually · 14-day free trial
$79/mo
about €70/mo · Starter plan · billed yearly ($99/mo, about €88, billed monthly)
Writesonic pricing · checked October 2026
Euro amounts for prices published in US dollars are approximate, converted at the European Central Bank rate of 15 October 2026.
Trusted by teams building AI visibility across Europe
“Omnia helped us simplify how we look at AI visibility. Our AI leads inbound grew by 30%.”
Four engines tracked daily, three more upon request, in any country. Citation data down to the URL, and an agent that turns every gap into work your team can ship.
Tracking tools show you a score. Omnia shows you the source. Every citation tracked to URL level, classified by page type, owned, third-party, or social. Then it reverse-engineers the pattern into a content brief, a placement target, and a task list your team can execute this week.
Citations shift when new content is indexed, when competitors publish, and when models update. Omnia captures those changes that same day.
The Omnia Agent proposes Projects built from citation data, each with its evidence. You accept, start or discard them on one board, and it marks each one Done when the work is in place.
Because built-in and purpose-built are not the same thing. Writesonic's self-serve plans track ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews daily in one market; sentiment starts on Growth ($399/mo, about €356, billed yearly), and 9 engines and the full Action Center are on Enterprise. Omnia was built exclusively to do this: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode on every plan, real browser execution in any country and language, citation intelligence to URL level, feature-level sentiment analysis benchmarked against competitors, prompt suggestions grounded in citation patterns, and the Omnia Agent to act on what it finds. If AI visibility is a core part of how your team operates, the depth difference is significant.
Yes - and for many teams, that's the right answer. Writesonic is strongest at producing content. Omnia tells you whether that content is being cited in AI answers, which competitor is winning the slots you should own, and the Omnia Agent proposes what to write next as Projects - and can create and publish it, with your approval. The two tools sit at different points in the same workflow.
Only if you're on the plan that includes it. Writesonic tracks up to 9 engines on Enterprise; its self-serve plans track three - ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews - in one market. Omnia tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode on every plan, with Claude, Gemini and Copilot available upon request, and covers them properly: real browser sessions in actual geographic locations, daily refresh cadence, citation data to URL level. Writesonic doesn't specify how its geographic queries are executed. Omnia gives you accurate data for the markets and engines that drive pipeline.
Writesonic offers sentiment analysis from its Growth plan ($399/mo, about €356, billed yearly) and doesn't publish how granular it is. Omnia tracks sentiment at the feature level on every plan - showing how AI evaluates each specific product attribute, benchmarking those attributes against competitors, and tracking how scores shift over time. If a competitor is being praised for ease of onboarding and your brand isn't getting credit for the same capability, Omnia surfaces that gap specifically and tells you what to do about it.
It depends on what you need from it. Writesonic's Starter plan at $79/mo (about €70) billed yearly gives you 50 prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews in one market, without sentiment; sentiment starts at $399/mo (about €356) billed yearly. Omnia's Growth plan at €79/mo (€63/mo billed annually) gives you 25 prompts across four engines, including Perplexity and Google AI Mode, in any country and language, with feature-level sentiment and the Omnia Agent; Pro (€279/mo) raises that to 100 prompts. If you're using Writesonic's content generation heavily alongside the visibility features, both tools together may be the right answer.
Yes. Every Omnia plan lets you track prompts in any country and language. Geographic tracking runs through real browser sessions in actual locations, so the data reflects what buyers in each market actually see. Writesonic's self-serve plans include one market (a language and a country), with custom regions on Enterprise, and it doesn't specify its geographic execution methodology.
